and Crown Thy Good with Brotherhood …
Pennsylvania BAR Association
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
by Augustus Blackstone
Posted on June 29, 2017 (by David Robinson / webmaster)
The American BAR Association (and its State alter-egos) has, for all intents and purposes, taken over our entire federal, state, and local governments. The legislative branch follows the advice of their BAR member advisors in the constructing of statutes. The executive branch does the same in the enforcement of those statutes. The judicial branch is literally a closed union shop in that regard. You can’t be a judge unless you are BAR member and you can’t practice in their courts unless you are a BAR member.
The term “BAR” is an acronym for British Accredited Registry [see comments below]. These snakes are in fact working for the Crown of England. And that is why the gold fringed flags are in the courtrooms. It signifies admiralty jurisdiction* [maritime law], which is another way of saying British jurisdiction [England is a maritime nation]. When you cross the bar in a courtroom, you are entering a British colonial forum.
There are over 30 grievances listed against the King of England in the Declaration of Independence (1776). Nearly all of them are applicable today against the Crown of England via the BAR Association. If you don’t have a copy, get one and read it. Each grievance therein begins with “He” (in reference to the King). As you read through the grievances, mentally supplant “He” with “BAR Association, on behalf of the Crown of England” and you’ll see exactly what I mean.
The root for the term “attorney” originates in Sanskrit (the oldest known language) and its original meaning was “to turn or to twist”. That meaning carried forward largely unaltered into the English language. The letter “a”, when used as a word, is defined as “an indefinite article” and when used as a prefix it equates with the word “one” (indefinite article) which modifies the base word (torn) accordingly—as does the suffix “ey”.
The extra “t” is added to separate the two vowels for proper pronunciation in accordance with the rules of English grammar. Thus, “a-(t)torn-ey” quite literally means “one who turns” (something).
This takes on added meaning when you understand that the legal profession in England has a number of titles (job descriptions), such as Esquire, Barrister, Solicitor, Counselor, Attorney, etc. And each one has a very specific function within that monarchical system. An English attorney’s function is to see that all titles and estates properly turn over to the legitimate heirs. The closest equivalent to that function in this country would be an attorney who specializes in probate law.
It is no accident that the generic term used to describe a practitioner of law in this country is “attorney”. As agents for the Crown of England, their function is to turn the sovereignty and wealth of this country back over to the Crown of England. And they have just about succeeded.
The “Father of the Constitution”, James Madison, stated in the Federalist Papers: “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
The American Bar Association (ABA) was first organized in 1878. Its purposes were “to promote the administration of justice, to advance jurisprudence, to uphold professional honor, and to encourage social intercourse among lawyers.” [Jerold S. Auerbach, Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America (1976)] The “Federal Bar Association” was officially incorporated by Congress in 1954, Public Law 662, Chapter 911.
I have not found any evidence that BAR is indeed an acronym for British Accredited Registry. According to Augustus Blackstone, the tie-in to the American Bar Association is the “Inns of Court”. “The [American] Revolution swept away a `bar’ in the English sense of an upper branch of the profession, possessing certain special privileges by virtue of its connection with the Inns of Court.” [PRESENT-DAY LAW SCHOOLS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1928, by Alfred Reed.]
However, the British Inns of Court eventually planted its roots on American soil. The following quote was taken from the American Inns of Court website: “…the American Inns of Court adopted the traditional English model of legal apprenticeship and modified it to fit the particular needs of the American legal system.”
So just what is the “English model” today? Here is how Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed.) defines “Inns of Court”. “These are certain private unincorporated associations, in the nature of collegiate houses, located in London, and invested with the exclusive privilege of calling people to the bar, that is, conferring the rank or degree of a barrister. They were founded probably about the beginning of the fourteenth century. The principal inns of court are the Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, and Gray’s Inn. The two former originally belonged to the Knights Templar.”
The key question that Mr. Blackstone asks regarding the Inns of Court is: Whose court is it? The answer he gives is, of course, the Crown of England.
Even today in England admission to an Inn is required before registration on the Bar Vocational Course. The Knights Templar is a secret society; they were the first international bankers. Today the Knights Templar is also part of another secret society, Freemasonry. Notice the use of the word “degree” in the Inns of Court definition above. The word “degree” is a secret society term which refers to the level to which the initiate has risen.
The initiate must take “blood oaths” in order to progress to higher levels of initiation. A friend of mine who was a 32 degree “Shriner” Freemason left the secret society because the blood oaths became unconscionable and repulsive to him. The blood oaths themselves imply or state that the initiate will suffer a most horrible death if he reveals the secrets of the lodge. Some men have reported being required to drink blood from a skull as part of a Masonic initiation.
Many judges and lawyers are Freemasons. In fact, a very large number of civil servants, from judges to presidents, are members of secret societies such as Skull & Bones, Knights of Malta and Freemasonry.
Can we trust judges and lawyers who are Freemasons? According to the HANDBOOK OF MASONRY by Ronanyne, page 183: “You must conceal all the crimes of your brother Mason….and should you be summoned as a witness against a brother Mason be always sure to shield him. It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you’re keeping your obligations.”
The following is the blood oath that Freemasonic “Shriners” take: “In willful violation whereof may I incur the fearful penalty of having my eyeballs pierced to thru center with a three-edged blade, my feet flayed and forced to walk the hot sands upon the sterile shores of the red sea until the flaming Sun shall strike with a livid plague, and my Allah the god of Arab, Moslem and Mohammedan, the God of our fathers, support me to the entire fulfillment of the same.”
Augustus Blackstone suggests that the sovereignty and wealth of America is being turned back to the Crown of England through Admiralty Jurisdiction. This may very well be the case. In the early 50s, Norman Dodd was the Director of Research for a Congressional investigation into the tax-exempt Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie foundations. What he discovered was that these foundations were working together to control the educational system of America so that Americans would be indoctrinated into the principles of collectivism as opposed to the principles in the original united States’ Constitution and Declaration of Independence.
Furthermore, here is what Mr. Dodd stated about Mr. Carnegie: “His publicly declared and steadfast interest was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great Britain. He was devoted just to putting the pieces back together again.” Mr. Dodd indicated that it was the bankers and lawyers who were making this possible.
Today the courts in America do in fact display a gold-fringed Admiralty flag. However, the judges and prosecutors of the Bar Association always refuse to reveal the jurisdiction when asked. The jurisdiction is a secret that they do not want people to know about. This means that the Bar Association is, in fact, a secret society.
On a few occasions, judges have lied about their secret jurisdiction by stating that the court was under “statutory” jurisdiction. The imposition of Admiralty jurisdiction on land was one of the primary grievances that the colonists had against King George. The first paragraph of the DECLARATION AND RESOLVES OF THE FIRST CONTINENTAL CONGRESS OF OCTOBER 14, 1774 sums it up:
“Whereas, since the close of the last war, the British parliament, claiming a power, of right, to bind the people of America by statutes in all cases whatsoever, hath, in some acts, expressly imposed taxes on them, and in others, under various pretences, but in fact for the purpose of raising a revenue, hath imposed rates and duties payable in these colonies, established a board of commissioners, with unconstitutional powers, and extended the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty, not only for collecting the said duties but for the trial of causes merely arising within the body of a county.”
FOLLOW THE MONEY:
The Rothschilds and the Bank of England along with the London Banking houses ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks in America through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. As Alan Greenspan stated in London on September 25, 2002: “The tie between the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve was cemented during the 1920s.” Actually, that “tie” was formed even before the Federal Reserve Act was fraudulently passed in 1913.
It is also interesting to note that former President George Bush (Sr) was knighted by the Queen of England. The founding fathers prohibited such “titles of nobility”. The question remains: Who was George Bush actually serving when he was President—We the People or the British Empire? According to the prestigious “Burke’s Peerage”, a guide to English aristocracy, George Bush and John Kerry are both descendants of Queen Elizabeth II as well as other British royalty. About two-thirds of the US presidents are cousins with ties to British royalty. Al Gore is also one of the elite. He is a cousin to the Bush family as well as Richard Nixon.
It was George Bush (Sr) who used the phrase “New World ORDER” many times in public speeches. Both George Bush, Jr. and George Bush, Sr. are members of the infamous “Skull & Bones” secret society, aka the ORDER of Death or simply “The ORDER”, which originally came from Germany. Adolph Hitler wrote “My New ORDER” after writing “Mein Kampf”. George Bush’s father, Prescott Bush, was also a Skull & Bones member along with Percy Rockefeller and Bush family business partners, the Harrimans. Their symbol is, in fact, a skull and crossbones—the symbol for drugs, poison, piracy, death and the Nazi’s “Death’s Head” battalion.
According to Dr. Leonard Horowitz, Prescott Bush joined John D. Rockefeller and the British Royal Family in sponsoring the eugenics initiatives that gave rise to Hitler’s racial hygiene programs. Prescott Bush was found guilty of trading with the enemy (the Nazis) during WWII. According to court records, the Rockefeller family and their Standard Oil Company supported Hitler more than they did the allies during WWII. In fact, one judge declared Mr. Rockefeller guilty of treason. Dr. Gary Glum has also documented the insidious eugenics programs to create a “superior race”, which was initially sponsored not by Adolph Hitler, but by the American elite (e.g., the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman, Morgan, DuPont, Kellogg, and Bush families).
The Rockefeller family, along with their lawyer friends John and Allen Dulles, created the United Nations for the purpose of establishing a world government. Allen Dulles became head of the CIA as did George Bush, both members of secret societies. George Bush (Sr) is an active participant in the CIA’s MKUltra mind control programs.
On February 1, 1992, George Bush (Sr) addressed the General Assembly of the United Nations and stated: “It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” Patriotic Americans often view George Bush’s statement as treasonous. George Bush also stood before the United States Congress and stated that the “New World Order” is the “rule of law”. Perhaps what he meant to say was “rule of lawyers” because it is the lawyers and judges in America who are in fact implementing the “New World Order” through fraud. However, not all lawyers are aware of the ultimate plan of the global elite and many lawyers are helping to restore our natural rights and freedoms.
[The information given above are just tidbits to inspire the reader to conduct his or her own research into global elitist families and their insidious plans for a totalitarian world government and creation of a “superior race”. These people are heavily invested in the pharmaceutical industry and they are stealing our health freedoms. One of the main organizations that the global elite are using to establish a world government is the Bilderberg Group.]
CLICK HERE to read about the connection the American Bar Association and the Number of the Beast.
*It is important to note that admiralty law is the law of the sea; the united States’ Constitution is the “supreme Law of the Land”.
For more information and documentation on the admiralty jurisdiction fraud visit http://www.barefootsworld.net/admiralty.html.
For more information on the Congressional investigation of the tax-exempt Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie foundations, read the Norman Dodd interview by G. Edward Griffin at http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/dodd/interview.htm or get a copy of this must see video from Mr. Griffin’s website at http://realityzone.com/hiddenagenda.html.
This article may be reproduced and distributed only under the conditions 1) that it be free of charge; 2) that it be reproduced in its entirety without any alterations; and that a link to http://www.HealthFreedom.info must be included.
For an objective look at the UN-constitutional operations of State BAR Associations.
See Public Service … 5 U.S.C. § 2635.101
The Pennsylvania BAR Association is generally thought to be an honorable “professional” organization of professional attorneys, lawyers and judges organized for the purpose of maintaining ethical standards to provide “honest services” to the public under Rules that require all members to protect and preserve the Constitutional rights of litigants, and to enter into contracts that respect those Rules, whether for “court” appearances or otherwise. The practice of law is more of an INDUSTRY than a “profession”.
As this Page expands, we will learn that state BAR Associations ( franchised in Pennsylvania and other states ), are neither “honorable”, “professional”, “ethical” or even “honest”. These appraisals apply equally to judges and lawyers. Keep in mind that Judges are at the Top of the Food Chain in the Legal Industry. The existence of state Bar Associations is to serve the “parent” organization, the American Bar Association (“A.B.A.”) in activities that neither respects, nor protects and preserves the Constitution of the United States. In 2016, a group of patriots filed an “International Indictment” naming the A.B.A. as one of the defendants in a multi-layered a scheme that undermines the Rule of Law.
BAR Associations in the United States [per Wikipedia]
Membership in the bar is a privilege burdened with conditions.
—Benjamin N. Cardozo, In re Rouss, 221 N.Y. 81, 84 (1917)
In the United States, admission to the bar is permission granted by a particular court system to a lawyer to practice law in that system. This is to be distinguished from membership in a bar association. In the United States, some states require membership in the state bar association for all attorneys, while others do not.
Although bar associations historically existed as unincorporated voluntary associations, nearly all bar associations have since been organized (or reorganized) as corporations. Furthermore, membership in some of them (see the next section below) is no longer voluntary, which is why some of them have omitted the word “association” and merely call themselves the “state bar” to indicate that they are the incorporated body that constitutes the entire admitted legal profession of a state.
Mandatory, integrated, or unified bar associations
Some states require membership in the state’s bar association to practice law there. Such an organization is called a mandatory, integrated, or unified bar, and is a type of government-granted monopoly. They exist at present in a slight majority of U.S. states: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington State, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. The District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands also have unified bars. The mandatory status of the Puerto Rico Bar Association was eliminated in 2009 by an act of the legislature, ratified by recently appointed majority of the Puerto Rico Supreme Court. By act of the Puerto Rico legislature, the mandatory status was reinstated in June, 2014. The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico struck down this act in October, 2014, finding that the it unconstitutionally usurped powers of the Supreme Court.
Conspicuous by its absence from the list of “mandatory, integrated, or unified bar associations is “The BAR Association for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania”, raising the question as to whether Kathleen Kane, PA Attorney General, can be prohibited from the practice of law by arbitrary “suspension” from the BAR Association?
Other questions as to whether SCOPA (Supreme Court of PA) overstepped its authority and deprived A.G. Kane of “due process” when it acted arbitrarily and unilaterally to “suspend” Kane’s ‘license’ to practice law, or whether SCOPA lacks subject matter jurisdiction to take such action. cf Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement. Cite as Pa.R,.D.E., Title 42, Pa C.S.A.
Further, the question arises as to whether Pa.R.D.E. is “unconstitutional” on its face for permitting the SCOPA to deprive an attorney of a “property interest” without a hearing before a court of law.
In some states, like Wisconsin, the mandatory membership requirement is implemented through an order of the state supreme court, which can be revoked or canceled at any time at the court’s discretion. In others, like Oregon, the state legislature passed a law and created a government agency. California went farther than any other state and wrote the State Bar of California into its constitution.
The first state to have an integrated bar association was North Dakota in 1921.
The following demonstrates the hypocrisy of American Law:
U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 47 › § 1001
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
18 U.S. (Criminal) Code § 1001 – Statements or entries generally.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive,
legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or
fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the
offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than
8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591,
then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements,
representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that
proceeding. (Subsection (b) clearly excuses criminal misconduct for members of the BAR associations.)
(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or
services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or
regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee,
commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
NOTE: the criminal statute, para. (b) exempts members of the legal industry which undermines the search for Truth and “alleged” objectives of “courts of law”. American courts have NO INTEGRITY!
NOTE: With respect to other statement(s) intended to falsify, conceal, or cover up by trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or … makes any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation; (e.g., “I did NOT Have Sex with that woman!” >>> POTUS Wm. Jefferson Clinton; or “I turned over all government emails.” >>> POTUS nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton). Both deserve to be “indicted” under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
Without Truth, there can be No Justice! Without Justice, there is No Freedom!
More to Come …