Oh Beautiful for spacious skies,
for amber waves of grain …
We are hard pressed on every side, yet not crushed;we are perplexed,
but not in despair; persecuted,but not forsaken; struck down,
but not destroyed — 2 Corinthians 4:8-9
The Declaration of Independence was the promise;
the Constitution was the Fulfillment.
110th Congress, 1st Session / House Document 110 – 51
In 1852, that great abolitionist of slavery Frederick Douglass stated:
“I have said that the Declaration of Independence is the ring-bolt to the chain of your nation’s destiny; so, indeed, I regard it. The principles contained in that instrument are saving principles. Stand by those principles, be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.”
“Whatever is hateful to you, do not do to your fellowman. This is the Torah.
All else is interpretation.” —– Rabbi Hillel
PA Court Injustice presents this page as a reference and reminder of the rights and privileges afforded all citizens under the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It offers a comparison with statutes and ‘rules and regulations’ that may impinge on the constitutional rights of We the People, and publishes federal and State statutes that make it a crime to deprive persons of their rights under the U.S. Constitution.
“The Constitution of the United States is a LAW for rulers and people equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its protection ALL classes of men, at ALL times, and under ALL circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was EVER invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of the government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or to despotism.” [Statement of Opinion, U.S. Supreme Court, Annals 1866, in response to a new class of proposed infringing Reconstruction legislation that was similarly promoted on the basis “national emergency”.] (avr)
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government, lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.” – – Patrick Henry (1736-1799).
… preservation of a free government requires not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power may be invariably maintained; but more especially, that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The People who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves, nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves. >> James Madison, Address to the General Assembly Of the Commonwealth Of Virginia (undated), reprinted in 2 James Madison, The Writings of James Madison (1783-1787) at 122-23.
Freedom consists NOT in doing what we Like, but in Having the RIGHT to do what we Ought! — Pope John Paul II.
“Good is the Enemy of Best.”
We cannot wage WAR against the Enemy until We IDENTIFY the ENEMY!
We have MET the Enemy, and HE is US! — Pogo
The ENEMY Within!
The Enemy of We the People is the Government of the United States. The judicial branch has fed us to the LIONS … and We the People have succumbed like Lambs. It is as EASY as catching wild boar.
NOTE: In 2009, “Affordable Health Care” (a.k.a. “ObamaCare”) was added to the list. In Truth, A.H.C. is neither “affordable” nor does it provide Health “Care” for subscribers.
The True State of The Union!
The US and all states are under complete control of judicial and political criminals that have prostituted themselves and their positions of Trust. They are members or associates of the Greatest Organized Crime Syndicate Ever Known to mankind. They are BAR members attorneys, judges and politicians that comprise up to 70% of our so called elected representatives.
THE BAR CONTROLS THE ENTIRE US! … WAKE UP!!!
Prepare for a living hell for We The People allowed these beings to set up mini dictatorships i.e. District Attorneys, Sheriffs, the Godless BAR, and the Parties they have sold their souls and they have sold us out to the highest bidder… In essence the US and all states are as the BIBLE refers to the US: ” The Great Prostitute! AKA, the New Whore of Babylon…and We are to Blame…….. Wake Up!
(thanks and compliments to Greg Todd)
PA Court Injustice reviews the application of ‘law’ in our courts to demonstrate how the courts systematically deprive us our rights and suppress our spirit.
The U.S. Constitution is a CONTRACT between “We the People” and a government formed by the People to serve the People. Each State constitution establishes a subordinate, auxiliary Contract with the inhabitants of the respective state. Under these CONTRACTs, a Public Trust secures those individual rights as enumerated in the Bill of Rights et al and the Inherent Rights of Mankind as specified and enumerated in the State Constitution (of Pennsylvania). Every Citizen is a beneficiary of those rights under the Public Trust.
The government administers the Law on behalf of the People. Its agents are”public servants” subject to the ethical constricts of 5 CFR § 2635.101.
(a) Public Service is a public Trust … 5 CFR § 2635.101 Basic obligation of public service.
(b) General principles. …
(1) Public service is a public trust, requiring employees to place loyalty to the
Constitution, the laws and ethical principles above private gain.
42 Pa.C.S. § 2522. Oath of office. (For Pennsylvania attorneys)
Before entering upon the duties of his office, each attorney at law shall take and subscribe the following oath
or affirmation before a person authorized to administer oaths:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and
the Constitution of this Commonwealth and that I will discharge the duties of my office with fidelity, as well
to the court as to the client, that I will use no falsehood, nor delay the cause of any person for lucre or malice.”
Any person refusing to take the oath or affirmation shall forfeit his office.
All Pennsylvania judges are Public Officers (Servants) who serve the Public as trustees under the Constitution of the Commonwealth … , Article VI , Section 3. They are required to take and subscribe a similar Oath of Office before assuming the duties of Office.
The U.S. Constitution is the codification of God’s Law into Rules for Man to Live by. In other words, the U.S Constitution translates Natural Law and Moral Law into Organic Law; the translation into a “public trust” contract between ‘government’ and the People to be served. This Contract has been handed down from Moses, and Mosaic Principles of Commercial Law.
All law is “civil”, ergo, commercial.
Mosaic Principles of Commercial Law
The principles, maxims and precepts of Commercial Law are eternal and unchangeable and unchanging. They are expressed in biblical language in both the Old and New Testaments. Commercial Law has remained unchanged for thousands of years and it forms the underlying foundation for all law and governments in the world; the Law of Nations and everything that human civilization is built on.
This is why Mosaic Principles are so powerful and fundamental.
When you operate at this level, by these processes, nothing that is of an inferior statute can overturn it or change it or abrogate it or meddle with it. Commercial (“organic”) Law remains the fundamental source of authority and power and functional reality.
There are ten essential maxims or precepts in Commercial Law :
(1) The first of these, expressed in Old Testament terms in Exodus 20:15 is “Thou shalt not steal”, which is, in terms of Commercial Law, “A WORK-MAN IS WORTHY OF HIS HIRE”.
(2) The second maxim of Commercial Law is “Equality before the law”, or more precisely, “ALL ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW”.
What this ultimately means is that Commercial Law, being founded on unchangeable principles of both Natural and Moral Law, is binding on everyone. i.e., “No Man is Above the Law!”
The Constitution of the United States was ratified under “Mosaic Principles”.
Man continues to create governments which presume to be able to supersede or abrogate Natural or Moral Law. E.g., man has amended Natural Law and Moral Law to “exempt” classes of persons who have immunity from accountability to the Law.
This concept is fatally flawed as being in conflict with Natural Law and Moral Law.
When one man attempts to impose His concept of law on another, it is only Natural that a conflict arises. When a conflict expands, it becomes a “war”.
Today, in America, we are on the brink of a “war” between different factions attempting to impose their “law” upon others. At the center of the conflict are “judges” (courts) who refuse to perform the duties of their office with fidelity to organic Law, the “Constitution”, the codification of Natural Law and Moral Law. “Immunity from prosecution” is in conflict with the Mosaic Principles of Commercial Law.
In direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution, judges have granted themselves “immunity” from the most fundamental Principle of Natural and Moral Law, to wit: “No Man is Above the Law!”
Disregard of organic law constitutes the foundation for the pre-ordained destruction and demise of a civilization because that civilization has been built on a false foundation.
So the second maxim must be, “everyone is equal under the law”. In other words, Natural and Moral Law are binding on everyone, and no one can escape it.
For someone to say that he is “above the law”, meaning above this law in particular, is quite insane. It is in fact that “immunity” is the major human insanity in the world. Man continues to live and act and believe and form systems, organizations, governments, laws, and processes which presume to be able to supersede or abrogate Natural or Moral Law; a True INSANITY.
This is why man keeps having wars and problems of conflict, and building up civilizations which are pre-ordained to their ultimate destruction: because they are constructed on a false foundation.
So the second maxim then, is, “everyone is equal under the law”. In other words, Natural and Moral Law are binding on everyone, and no one can escape it.
The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law. Aristotle (384 BC – 322 BC)
(3) Maxim Number 3 is a most comforting rule one could possibly have. It establishes the foundation for your peace-of-mind, your security and your capacity to win and triumph (get a remedy) in this business. And that is:
“IN COMMERCE, TRUTH IS SOVEREIGN”.
“Respect for the truth comes close to being the basis for all morality.” — Frank Herbert
Truth is Sovereign … and the Sovereign tells only the truth! (Your word is your bond!)
If truth were not Sovereign in Commerce (Commerce meaning, essentially, all human endeavor, action and inter-relationships) there would be no basis for anything. No basis for law and order, no basis for accountability, there would be no standards, no capacity to resolve anything since there is no basis to resolve anything.
Absent the reliability that Truth is Sovereign would mean that “anything goes”, “it’s each man for himself” and “nothing matters”. There can be No Law!
That is worse than the law of the jungle. ergo, “IN COMMERCE, TRUTH IS SOVEREIGN”.
(4) Maxim Number 4 is a corollary of Maxim 3.
The fourth principle of Commercial Law is: “TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT”. An Affidavit is your solemn “sworn” expression of your truth.
(5) Maxim Number 5 in Commercial Law is “AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS THE TRUTH IN COMMERCE”. Claims are made. If they go unchallenged, they become “admissions” and emerge as the Truth in the matter.
(6) And accordingly, Maxim Number 6 holds: “AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT BECOMES THE JUDGEMENT IN COMMERCE”. There is nothing left to resolve.
(7) Maxim Number 7 in Commercial Law is that “IN COMMERCE, FOR ANY MATTER TO BE RESOLVED IT MUST BE EXPRESSED”.
This is simply another way of saying that nobody is a mind reader. You have to put your position out there, you have to state what the issue is, to have something to talk about and resolve.
(8) Now, we need to back up a little to the Affidavit stage because this is the crux of the whole affair. The primary users, interpreters and codifiers of Commercial Law in Western civilization, and perhaps in the world, are the Jews. They provided much of the World with Mosaic Law they have had (and obeyed) for 4000+ years.
An ancient principle of Mosaic Law holds that whoever leaves the field of battle first, loses by default. Translated into commerce, it is that an Affidavit, which has been served on the court and is not rebutted point-for-point by another Affidavit stands as TRUTH IN COMMERCE. Failure to answer (rebutt) is an admission, a forfeit, which leads us to Maxim Number 8 of Commercial Law:
“HE WHO LEAVES THE FIELD OF BATTLE FIRST LOSES BY DEFAULT”.
The alleged reason for the existence of governments (courts of law) and all the laws and processes is to resolve disputes, and, essentially, to resolve conflicts between Affidavits of Truth. Whose Affidavit of Truth, whose stance is correct, is sound, is real, is true? When all the lights are turned on, when all the truth is out, when everything is opened up and we uncover what is actually going on, Whose stance will endure?
Governments allegedly exist as substitutes for the dueling field and the battlefield, in order that that disputes, conflicts of Affidavits of Truth, if you will, are resolved by civilized and peaceful and reasonable means instead of by violence. People can then take their disputes into a court and have them all opened up and resolved, instead of going out and marching ten paces, and turning around and resorting to violence.
(9) SACRIFICE IS THE MEASURE OF CREDIBILITY (No Willingness to Sacrifice = No Liability, No Responsibility, No Authority or Measure of conviction)
Maxim Number 9 is the two-edged sword we spoke of earlier. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. A person must put himself on the line and assume a position, take a position, as regards the matter at hand. One cannot realize the potential of gain without also exposing himself to the potential of loss. Every contract (Commercial law) requires a quid pro quo. In commerce, like a poker game, both parties must “ante up”!
They must both have “skin in the game”.
Failure to enforce Maxim #9 is possibly the most destructive cause for the failure of all democracies in the world. When a person without “skin in the game” is permitted to share the “pot”; i.e., “vote” themselves a share, The Principles of Commercial Law have been corrupted.
The economic basis for the culture is doomed. It experiences a “Conflict” of Law.
(10) Maxim Number 10 of Commercial Law is: A LIEN OR CLAIM CAN BE SATISFIED ONLY through Point-for-Point REBUTTAL by AFFIDAVIT, RESOLUTION BY JURY, or PAYMENT.
In Commerce, a lien or claim can be satisfied in any one of three ways: (a) By someone rebutting your Affidavit (your Commercial Affidavit) with another Commercial Affidavit of his own, point-for-point until the matter is resolved as to whose affidavit is correct; or, in the case of non- resolution; (b) You may convene a Sheriff’s Common Law Grand Jury based on the Seventh Amendment; or (c) the only remaining method to settle the dispute or satisfy a lien is to pay it.
These Principles of Commercial Law are available on the CONTRACT page.
“The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for, among old parchments, or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.”
Alexander Hamilton, 1775
Not ONE of these rights may be waived!
All rights have been endowed upon We the People by our Creator. [Declaration of Independence]. Court officers, including prosecutors and judges, have a fiduciary responsibility [a legal duty] as public servants to serve as trustees under that Public Trust and to secure for all beneficiaries thereto the rights as intended. A breach of their fiduciary responsibility constitutes a breach of trust by the government, subject to all penalties which may attach thereto. Further, a breach of one’s fiduciary responsibility places that trustee “at war” with the Constitution.
We the People are beneficiaries of that Public Trust. Among the benefits is the “intangible right to honest services” from every officer (trustee) acting in the name of ‘government’ under color of law. A trustee who breaches that trust must be held accountable to We the People and to any individuals harmed by that breach.
State courts are empowered to act in a judicial capacity under Article III of the federal Constitution / CONTRACT. All judges, federal or State, are required to subscribe an oath of office before entering the duties of that office and have a LEGAL DUTY [fiduciary responsibility] to serve under their oath.
State courts are empowered to act in a judicial capacity under Article III of the federal Constitution / CONTRACT. Article VI of the federal Constitution is known as the “supremacy clause” that subordinates every state constitution and statute to conformance with the rights granted the People under the federal constitution. All judges are bound under Article VI of the federal Constitution to preserve the rights of all citizens.
We are compelled to examine state constitutions for compliance with Article VI to determine whether state law violates the supremacy clause and whether state courts act in the absence of jurisdiction when they knowingly and intentionally prosecute under a state statute that fails to conform with the federal supremacy clause.
A review of the Constitution of Pennsylvania (rev. 1968) reveals several UN-constitutional Articles/Sections within that Constitution, all of which emerge under the intent to establish a “unified judicial system”.
So long as a judge administers the law within the limits of his authority and jurisdiction, that judge is granted qualified immunity from personal liability. When a rogue judge violates his fiduciary responsibility, that judge undermines the integrity of the judicial branch of government and also undermines public confidence in the judiciary.
A judge who acts contrary to the Oath of Office or otherwise violates the constitutional rights of a litigant loses (forfeits) any immunity attached to his office.
Every State accepts federal money for compliance with the Child Support Enforcement Program, a.k.a. CSEP [45 CFR 302/304]. In accepting federal money for compliance with a federal Code, judges have a DUTY under the delegation of judicial powers and their oath of office to conduct hearings in conformance and compliance with the U.S. Constitution.
Because the federal government provides “financial incentives” to the States under CSEP, child support actions in every State must protect and preserve the constitutional rights of defendants.
Whether CSEP is an UN-constitutional expansion of authority by the federal government into the rights and powers reserved to the several States is a “constitutional question” for discussion and ultimately for judicial review in the Supreme Court. Regardless of that decision, the distribution of federal monies via CSEP is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL “cash cow” for State courts.
A List of Documents contains excerpts from the federal and State constitutions, federal and State statutes, the Code of Federal Regulations, and State rules / regulations that impinge on constitutional rights or fail to protect rights secured under a constitution or statute in order to comply with federal regulations, often to take full advantage of federal “financial incentives”.
Authority for any person to act in a judicial capacity arises from the Supreme Law of the Land; Article VI, paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution. That authority is delegated to the States under the caveat that all laws and judicial authority must pass Constitutional muster. State courts that fail to protect and defend the rights and privileges of individuals as secured under the Constitution places that “judge” at war with the Constitution, depriving the judge of jurisdiction to perform the duties of office. Warring with the Constitution renders a judge “unfit” for office.
“… particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803).
Article VI, Section 3 of the PAConstitution requires all public officers, including judges, to take and subscribe an oath of office that they “will support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this Commonwealth …” before performing the duties of their office, judicial or administrative.
Any speech critical of the courts should justify that position with clear irrefutable evidence that the court(s) are at war with the Constitution and the laws of this Land. Pa Court Injustice offers compelling evidence that the courts of Pennsylvania, top to bottom, are “at war” with the Constitution of the United States, and are frequently at war with the Constitution of Pennsylvania. In short, Pennsylvania courts are “corrupt”.
The viewer is encouraged to read excerpts from the Federal and State Constitutions to refresh your mind with inalienable rights bestowed upon us and secured as a “right” under these Constitutions. The reader may explore selected statutes, codes, rules and regulations that impair or impinge on those rights, or where a court may administer a law that is “fair on its face” with a “heavy hand or an evil eye”. We will look at and compare court rules and municipal ordinances to search for “laws” that violate constitutional rights.
We encourage dialogue that may compel a review and repeal of these “Codes” as failing “constitutional” muster. An exchange of ideas that identifies Constitutional Problems [Updated Oct. 2007 – Britney / Custody] and proposes Remedies essential to reclamation of the rights of “We the People” from a government that has forgotten its purpose. Robust discussion of a concept that a judicial interpretation of law becomes the law is welcome.
“The government is a juggling confederacy of a few to cheat the prince and enslave the people.”
– Edmund Burke
Pennsylvania’s Government takes “retaliatory” action, including criminal prosecution, against any who are critical of government. Such action has a chilling effect on the First Amendment “freedom of speech” rights of lawyers and residents. Retaliatory action by a public officer, e.g., judge, is prohibited under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4953.1, making it a “crime“.
Click to view a Letter from PA Supreme Court Justice Ronald D. Castille.
Federal and State courts systemically deprive persons of their rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Ninth Amendments. “Due process” is reduced to mere words without sinew by oppressive and tyrannical judges. These courts support municipalities and government agencies acting “under color of law” to exact penalties upon the unsuspecting victim, in many cases, unlawfully depriving persons of their property and freedom; i.e.,State-Sanctioned Stealing and State-Sanctioned Kidnapping.
We the People must maintain vigilance against Codes and Laws that deprive us our rights in violation of Amendments IX and X, which limit the power of Federal and State government to assume authority not specifically granted the government by our founding Fathers.
“It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.” American Communications Ass’n v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382; 70 S.Ct. 674 (1950).
Intentional misapplication of law must qualify as a “corrupt act or practice” for which a judge is subject to discipline, including impeachment / removal from office. See MISSION: Title 11 PACODE 11.8-806.
The Pennsylvania Constitution permits “We the People” to make changes to our government as necessity arises. This website argues that CHANGE is necessary, and that the change must be drastic.