Atty.Gen. Kane


Coming Soon …  

Removal from Office of PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane.  

Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Kathleen Kane, is under attack by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (“SCOPA”) for exposing criminal corruption in Pennsylvania courts. One must question whether the criminal attacks on the office of the A.G. is retaliatory or a defense against exposure of long-standing corruption in the highest court in the state.
Is there a “connection” to syndicated crime families? 

What is Judicial Misconduct?
Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge or a court knowingly and intentionally deprives one of the litigants of due process of law. One of the most frequent methods is for a court to assume jurisdiction where none exists, in abundance of law describes the misconduct. See jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction maybe the single most important Element in court proceedings.

“It is a fair characterization of the lawyer’s responsibility in our society that he stands “as a shield,” …, in defense of right and to ward off wrong. From a profession charged with such responsibilities there must be exacted those qualities of truth-speaking, of a high sense of honor, of granite discretion, of the strictest observance of fiduciary responsibility, that have, throughout the centuries, been compendiously described as “moral character”.”  Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238 (1957)  

Is the attack on Gen. Kane is an UnConstitutional action by SCOPA? Does a Pennsylvania Court commit TREASON when it assumes Jurisdiction for the action to Unseat ATTY. Gen. Kane?  Did SCOPA deprive Kane  of “due process” via “judicial misconduct” ? 

Does the SCOPA appear before the court with “UNCLEAN HANDS”?   

Prosecutors have requested consecutive prison sentences for Kathleen Kane, after the former Pennsylvania attorney general was convicted of perjury, official oppression and related crimes in August. Kane, meanwhile, has asked to be placed on probation, having been sufficiently “humbled and embarrassed” by her convictions.  

I was confronted by the same dilemma a decade ago, when an “establishment” attorney, Sam Stretton, by name recommended that I plead guilty, and request “mercy” from the Disciplinary Board of the the Supreme Court Of Pennsylvania.  I had committed no crime and I had been in compliance with Rule 8.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. However, compliance with Rule 8.3 raises a  question of noncompliance with rule 8.2. I raised “criminal charges” with then Governor Rendell, which he even failed to acknowledge. Rendell’s wife is a member of the BAR. The BAR association and judges despise any attorney foolish enough to bring criminal charges against a judge or judges. Retaliation against such foolish attorneys is a common practice in this Commonwealth.  The action against AG Kane is “retaliatory; a CRIME under 18 Pa.C.S. 4953

Based on my experience, I can see where Atty. Gen. Kane could have thought she had negotiating Power with the Pennsylvania courts. She erred in her judgment. Corrupt Authority has no need to grant mercy to an individual, especially an individual guilty of “whistleblowing”. Kane exposed a pattern and practice of exchanging pornographic materials among judges et al on Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court. She also had access to emails between judges that (possibly) revealed “pre-determined outcomes” of cases brought before SCOPa. The justices “had to” Get Rid Of Her. Kathleen Kane became a THREAT to the BAR Association … from within.

The request by prosecutors for consecutive prison sentences is an affront to the integrity of a public servant who risked her career to expose criminality in the highest court in the state and the oldest court in the Nation. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (“SCOPA”) acted without jurisdiction and without authority to suspend the license to practice law of Atty. Gen. Kathleen Kane. Pennsylvania rules for disciplinary enforcement commands that a hearing before the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court must be conducted before the Supreme Court has any jurisdiction in the matter. Under court rules, SCOPA acted without jurisdiction, Ergo, any action they take is a nullity, void ab initio, for lack of jurisdiction. One can sense the urgency to get rid of Kathleen Kane before she exposes the criminal corruption of more justices on SCOPA.


More to Come …