Barack Obama — POTUS

NEWSWEEK IS GOING OUT WITH A BANG!!! August 21, 2016 Issue

Newsweek Closed Its Doors with a Slam at Obama

     Newsweek Is Now History. The liberal Newsweek Magazine is going out of business, but not before it attacks the President. This is quite an article, even more so when you consider that NEWSWEEK finally had the guts to admit it. WOW! Newsweek COVER!!! It is their last cover before they fold. Also read the article at the end. AMAZING!!!

     Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his Agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by the liberal media…
                                 By Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist — Opinion Writer)

    Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?
    Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer;” a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
    He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor;” a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president? There is no evidence that he ever attended or worked for any university or that he ever sat for the Illinois bar. We have no documentation for any of his claims. He may well be the greatest hoax in history.Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. 

    But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were ‘a bit’ extreme, he was given a pass. Let that Sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard because of the color of his skin. Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon — affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves. Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back.  
     Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow.  
     Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is. And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
Speaking of “records”, the American people have less knowledge of Barack Obama than they have of ANY prior president. Those who “sponsored” Obama’s run for the presidency very carefully obtained a court order to have his Personal Records placed UNDER SEAL by Order of Court. 
     What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character.  Those people — conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches).

     And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerless-ness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?   
   In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office. 

2nd Amendment
     January 2016,  POTUS (Barack Obama) announced publicly that he was issuing an Executive Order (“EO”) to improve data collection on the sale and purchase of firearms.

     Obama pronounced himself as a “constitutional” Law Professor, claiming to know something about whether he has “authority” to enact such law via an EO.

To begin … Obama LIED!
Barack Hussein Obama was never a “Constitutional Law Professor” at Chicago University — or any other law school.
    Obama was never listed as a member of that university’s faculty, not even as an Adjunct professor. The nearest he may claim is that he was a “guest speaker” for a Constitutional Law ‘class’ of the world reknowned “Domestic Terrorist“, Bill Ayers. This may also be (and probably is) FALSE!
     Obama is not well-trained in Constitutional law, OTHERWISE he would KNOW that the 2nd Amendment was “drafted” and placed 2nd in the order of the “Bill of Rights” to afford protection of Americans under the Constitution from a tyrannical and oppressive “rogue” government.
      There is NO evidence that Barack Obama ever sat for the Multi-State BAR Exams. He has obtained a Court Order to keep his personal records “under seal“. We do not know if he actually attended Law School. There IS Evidence that  he knowingly forfeited his ‘alleged’ license to practice law; quite possibly to avoid exposure that he never took, much less PASSED the BAR Exam. Obama defrauded America!   
     Andrew Napolitano surely knows that Obama’s EO to expand data collection on arms violates his Oath of Office (ARTICLE II, Section 1), and is therefore an act of treason …  that undermines the Constitution.  The Constitution GRANTS exclusive authority to Congress to enact laws, with the opportunity for a POTUS to VETO any Congressional bill. ARTICLE I, Section 1.  
     A POTUS has absolutely NO Authority to enact a statute. The EO Obama intends to sign will violate the rights of Every American because it “Criminalizes” the exercise of a Constitutional “right” to “keep and bear arms”!
Such an Order WILL endorse an unauthorized “search” that impinges upon the essential freedoms of privacy, FREE from government scrutiny, and potential terrorism. Obama’s EO advocates “domestic terrorism” from within the White House.
     Napolitano suggested that the only recourse will be when a person accused of violating this Executive Order (“EO” ) is arrested, and then would bring a lawsuit before the court.
     I disagree. Congress has options.   
     One choice of action is to draft and PASS legislation that deletes any unconstitutional provisions from the EO and prohibits any impingement of 2nd Amendment rights by the White House. Another would be for Congress to refuse to “fund” enforcement of this EO. A third option would be to Appeal to SCOTUS to overturn the “SEAL RECORDS” Order, and if “fraud” is discovered, to initiate IMPEACHMENT proceedings in the House for violating his Oath of Office to support and defend the Constitution.    
     A second “constitutional” issue may also be raised.
     Congress has authority to issue a “show cause” rule on the White House to establish “subject matter jurisdiction” over the sale and purchase of firearms which powers are not delegated to the United States within the four corners of the U.S. Constitution, which are then, under the 10th Amendment, reserved to the States respectively, OR TO THE PEOPLE.

America would be well-served to see and hear these issues discussed in an Open Forum.

P.S. Please send this article to family and friends throughout America and ask them to read and distribute this article to others …