Work In Process …   WIP!

   No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity.                                         —        James Madison

PROBLEMS — Reasons for Judicial Atrocities

     This website is necessitated because Public Servants, judges and others working in County courtrooms across this Commonwealth are involved in a criminal enterprise to obtain Federal money in exchange for unjust adjudication of Child support under (PA R.C.P. 1910) and Child custody (PA R.C.P. 1915) cases. Family courts are but a small example of the corruption and criminal misconduct that appears in (nearly) “every” courtroom in the U.S. of A.
       Pennsylvania Court Injustices intends to identify the “power” behind governmental criminal misconduct that conceals the TRUE Problems that Trample the Constitutional and Civil Rights of litigants and that has stripped “INTEGRITY” from American courts. 

GOTO to view concurring videos.

View “DECONSTRUCTING AMERICA” videos; Part 1 (Time 7:57) and Part 2 (Time 7:54)

The Constitution of Pennsylvania, Article VI, Section 3 (and 42 Pa.C.S. § 2522) requires all judicial, State and county officers to take the following Oath of Office:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this Commonwealth and that I will discharge the duties of my office with fidelity.”

   “Fidelity” is the operative word in that Oath. Ironically (or intentionally) Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., fails to specifically define the word, ergo, we shall rely on Webster.
Fidelity: faithful, the quality or state of being faithful; … ALLEGIANCE; FEALTY; LOYALTY; … faithfulness to something to which one is bound by a pledge, by duty, or by a sense of what is right or appropriate.

       All persons subject to this Oath accept their fiduciary responsibility (legal duty) as Trustee under the Public Trust.  Public corruption involves a “breach” of public trust and/or abuse of position by federal, state, or local officials and their private sector accomplices. A  frequently employed weapon of the corrupt judiciary is the ABUSE of AUTHORITY when applying a charge of “Contempt of court”! 
     Violating one’s Oath of Office constitutes a breach of Trust!  When a citizen is deprived of a Constitutional right, the breach of Trust (faithlessness) becomes a CRIME! … 18 USC §§ 241, 242.

     Our government owes the people an “intangible right to honest services” by all government agents, a.k.a. municipal employees/officers. Implicit in this statement is the inferred obligation to the people that our courts will be honest and will be administered by honest officers of the court and the government. Judges and prosecutors must be held to a higher standard of truth and integrity that the citizens for whom they administer the law.  18 USC § 1346. 

     To protect We the People from a tyrannical and corrupt government, every government agency must be “bonded”. All municipalities and municipal officers of the court must be bonded.  See Uniform Bonding Code (“UBC”

    “Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law breaker, it breeds contempt for the law, it      invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.”        —  Justice Louis D. Brandeis: Olmstead v. U.S. 

“Public Corruption”
    By broad definition, a government official, whether elected, appointed or hired, may be guilty of violating federal law when he/she asks, demands, solicits, accepts, or agrees to receive anything of value in return for being influenced in the performance of their official duties; a breach of trust. Further, public corruption may occur when a one or more “trustees”  –  “acting under color of law” conspire to DENY the Constitutional rights of litigants in state or federal courts  and knowingly and intentionally disregard the “constitutional delegation of authority” as prescribed under Article III, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution.
     The atrocities reported here are where public officers knowingly and willingly violate their Oath(s) of Office to DENY the rights of individuals in Pennsylvania courts.

     Everything that occurs in a courtroom on behalf of the Commonwealth occurs with the tacit consent of the judicial officer. Accordingly, every instance of prosecutorial misconduct not corrected by the ‘judge’ becomes a Judicial Atrocity and a criminal conspiracy of the court.

   Fraud on the court is one of the most serious Crimes that can occur in a court of law. Too frequently, the “Fraud” is perpetrated by the court or by “officers” in that court. Fraud upon the court denies one or both parties of “Due Process” of law which, a priori, forfeits jurisdiction of that court rendering any orders and judgments of that court to be void ab initio. See  “Crimes”.
     When fraud on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire case shall be cancelled / made void. A fraud occurs when a judge violates his Oath of Office, the Code of Judicial Conduct, and his fiduciary responsibility (duty) to support the PA or US Constitution. That judge is in “breach of trust” which makes him/her a “CRIMINAL” for conflict of interest crimes. 5 U.S.C. 2635.101.
    If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required under the Code of Judicial Conduct (Canon 3.C) to recuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisdictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court may be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.